The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities Investment Commission (ASIC), together the Regulators, have addressed a letter to all APRA-regulated entities on their observations on the registration and notification lodgements made by authorised deposit taking institutions (ADIs) since the commencement of the Financial Accountability Regime (FAR) to the banking industry on 15 March 2024. The letter is welcomed by the insurance and superannuation industries, who are busy implementing FAR ahead of the commencement date of the regime to those sectors on 15 March 2025.

The letter is accompanied by a cautionary warning that where entities fail to comply with their obligations under FAR, the Regulators may take further action, including when FAR commences for insurers and super funds.

What the Regulators are saying

The Regulators have identified areas requiring further consideration by ADIs and emphasise specific aspects of FAR, as described in previous regulatory guidance, for all industries to consider.

Notably, the Regulators have indicated:

  • Accountable entities should have robust frameworks in place to ensure registration and notification submissions are complete and comply with applicable obligations under FAR.

Reminder for insurance and superannuation entities

  • 18 November – 20 December 2024: Insurers and superannuation entities must submit their FAR entity profile.

  • 13 February – 22 February 2025: Insurers and superannuation entities must register their accountable persons.

For more guidance on how to complete the forms for submitting an entity profile and registering an accountable person, please refer to the Regulator’s FAR presentations here.

  • The accountable entity’s Board are expected to  demonstrate appropriate oversight and be prepared to attest to the adequacy of the entity’s FAR framework and its compliance with FAR obligations.

The Regulators’ observations

We have summarised what the Regulators have observed on the banking industry’s implementation of FAR about general and prescribed responsibilities, key functions and other aspects, as well as provided our own suggestions for consideration.

General and prescribed responsibilities

Regulators’ observation

Further consideration for accountable entities

G+T’s food for thought

Possible gaps in the assignment or notification of prescribed responsibilities, including responsibilities associated with prescribed positions

The Regulators refer to the key personnel obligations in section 23(1)(a)(ii) – (iii) of the Financial Accountability Regime Act 2023 (FAR Act). That is, the obligation on the accountable entity to ensure that the responsibilities of accountable persons cover each of the prescribed responsibilities and prescribed positions outlined in the Financial Accountability Regime Minister Rules 2024 (Minister Rules). 

All prescribed responsibilities must be covered by an accountable person.

Regulatory Guide 279 Financial Accountability Regime: Information for accountable entities (RG 279) states ‘the allocation of responsibilities is expected to appropriately reflect the size and nature of an accountable entity’s business and to accurately reflect the way those responsibilities are held’.

A full list of the prescribed responsibilities and positions is provided at the end of this article.

Consideration of general responsibilities 

Accountable entities must consider whether an individual holds general responsibilities that cause them to be an accountable person under s10(1) and 10(6) of the FAR Act.

Accountable persons who have general and prescribed responsibilities must identify this in the FAR forms.

We would encourage accountable entities to consider how general responsibilities are reflected in accountability statements, including which areas of responsibility are applicable on an enterprise-wide basis.

Possible gaps in the assignment or notification of accountable persons for and with responsibility in respect to SREs

Where accountable entities have significant related entities (SREs), it must identify any accountable persons of the SRE, consistent with the requirement in section 10(6) of the FAR Act.

Accountable entities should reflect on their accountability maps, including the group structure of the entity and composition of the Boards and senior executive teams that sit on each company in the group structure.

This may assist in identifying potential individuals that meet the threshold of being an accountable person of an SRE.

Multiple accountable persons jointly holding prescribed responsibilities

The Regulators consider individual accountability to be the clearest form of accountability. Apart from board members, jointly held responsibilities should be kept to a minimum.

Where there is currently joint accountability, entities should consider whether:

  • it is appropriate for multiple accountable persons to hold the prescribed responsibility, which may result in joint accountability for that responsibility or

  • changes should be made so a single accountable person holds the prescribed responsibility.

Joint accountability should be avoided. We encourage accountable entities to consider who the framework owner may be with respect to the prescribed responsibility. Having a clear understanding of framework and risk ownership is helpful in determining individual accountability.

Key functions

Regulators’ observation

Further consideration for accountable entities

G+T’s food for thought

Notification of applicable key functions

Accountable entities should notify the Regulators about the allocation of key functions which is required for the register of accountable persons. Entities must also notify the Regulators if there is any change to this allocation.

We emphasise that there are requirements in allocating a key function. These are:

  • the key function is undertaken by an accountable entity and

  • an accountable person has actual or effective senior executive responsibility for management or control of the whole of, or a significant or substantial part or aspect of, the key function.

A list of key functions across the industries is provided below.

Inappropriate allocation of key functions

Key functions should not be allocated to directors or senior officers outside Australia who have no senior executive responsibility, as key functions are senior executive responsibilities.

Allocation of key functions should only be for senior executives.

We encourage accountable entities to map out the allocation of key functions (whether this is in their accountability map or internal FAR arrangement documents), so there is a birds-eye view of this allocation. Caveats such as limitations and exclusions, should also be provided for each allocation should there be multiple accountable persons holding that key function.

Other

Regulators’ observation

Further consideration for accountable entities

G+T’s food for thought

Ceasing of accountable persons and material changes to their responsibilities

Accountable entities must submit timely notifications to the Regulators, via the approved FAR forms, when persons cease to be an accountable person under FAR or when there is any material change to their responsibilities. 

 

Where there is any transfer of business or licence revocation, the Regulators expect entities to submit their FAR notifications before this.

We encourage accountable entities to have a robust process for notifying the Regulators of the notifiable events in section 32 of the FAR Act:

  • A person ceases to be an accountable person.

  • An accountable person is dismissed or suspended because the person has failed to comply with one or more of the person’s accountability obligations under section 21.

  • The variable remuneration of an accountable person is reduced because the person has failed to comply with one or more of the person’s accountability obligations under section 21.

  • The accountable entity has reasonable grounds to believe:

    • the accountable entity has failed to comply with one or more of its accountability obligations under section 20 or of its key personnel obligations under section 23 or

    • an accountable person has failed to comply with one or more of the person’s accountability obligations under section 21.

  • A material change occurs to information that relates to an accountable person and is contained in the register of accountable persons.

How we can help

If you require assistance with your implementation of FAR or the making of enhancements to your existing governance, risk management, compliance and other arrangements, please let us know.

We have implemented Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) and FAR for a significant number of institutions in the banking, insurance and superannuation sectors and have led several internal BEAR investigations.

We routinely provide strategic advice to Boards and executives on the management of potential exposures under the regime.

Our capability extends to the implementation of the related APRA CPS 511 Remuneration.

For more information or assistance, contact our experts:

List of prescribed responsibilities and positions

Industry 

Responsibilities / Position

Reference

All entities

  • Senior executive responsibility for management or control of:

    • business activities

    • financial resources

    • operations.

  • Senior executive responsibility for management of:

    • overall risk controls or overall risk management arrangements

    • information management (including information technology systems)

    • internal audit function

    • compliance function

    • human resource function

    • dispute resolution function (whether internal or external, or both)

    • client or member remediation programs (including hardship arrangements)

    • breach reporting

    • if the accountable entity is a reporting entity for the purposes of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 — anti-money laundering function.

Minister Rules, section 5(2)

  • Member of the Board of directors (or equivalent)

Minister Rules, section 6(2)

Insurance

  • Senior executive responsibility for management of:

    • actuarial function

    • claims handling function.

Minister Rules, section 7(2)

Superannuation

  • Senior executive responsibility for management of:

    • member administration operations

    • investment function

    • financial advice service

    • insurance offerings.

Minister Rules, section 8(2)

Foreign accountable entities

  • Senior executive responsibility for conduct of the activities of a branch of the foreign accountable entity that is operating in Australia.

  • If the foreign accountable entity is a foreign ADI or a foreign general insurer — responsibility for overseeing the operation of a branch operating in Australia as a senior officer outside Australia with delegated authority from the board of directors (or equivalent) of the foreign accountable entity.

  • If the foreign accountable entity is an eligible foreign life insurance company — responsibility for oversight of the foreign accountable entity as a member of its Compliance Committee for the purposes of section 16ZF of the Life Insurance Act 1995.

  • If the foreign accountable entity is a foreign general insurer—responsibility as an agent in Australia for the purposes of section 118 of the Insurance Act 1973.

Minister Rules, section 9(2)

Non-operating holding companies (NOHCs)

  • Senior executive responsibility for management or control of:

    • business activities

    • financial resources.

  • Senior executive responsibility for management of:

    • overall risk controls or overall risk management arrangements

    • internal audit function.

Minister Rules, section 10(2)

  • Member of the Board of directors (or equivalent).

Minister Rules, section 11(2)

List of key functions

ADI

Insurance 

Superannuation 

ADI Key Function means each of the following key functions only if the ADI Key Function Requirements apply to a particular key function: 

Insurance Key Function means each of the following key functions only if the Insurance Key Function Requirements apply to a particular key function: 

Registrable superannuation entity (RSE) licensee Key Function means each of the following key functions only if the RSE licensee Key Function Requirements apply to a particular key function: 

Capital management 

Capital management 

Collections and enforcement (default, debt collections and recovery)

Collections and enforcement (default, debt collections and recovery)

Conduct risk management 

Conduct risk management 

Conduct risk management 

Credit risk management 

Data management 

Data management 

Data management 

Financial and regulatory reporting 

Financial and regulatory reporting 

Financial and regulatory reporting 

Hardship processes 

Hardship processes 

Hardship processes 

Investment management 

Liquidity and funding management 

Liquidity management 

Market risk management 

Marketing and advertising 

Member outcomes 

Operational risk management 

Operational risk management 

Operational risk management 

Product design and distribution obligations 

Product design and distribution obligations 

Product design and distribution obligations 

Product origination 

Product origination 

Product origination 

Recovery and exit planning and resolution planning 

Recovery and exit planning and resolution planning 

Recovery and exit planning and resolution planning 

Reinsurance management 

Scam management 

Scam management 

Scam management 

Technology management 

Technology management 

Technology management 

Training and monitoring of relevant representatives and staff 

Training and monitoring of relevant representatives and staff 

Training and monitoring of relevant representatives and staff 

Underwriting 

Whistleblower policy and process 

Whistleblower policy and process 

Whistleblower policy and process